Saturday, September 19, 2009

More regressive douchebaggery.

First it was a shit storm about money for mice and trains running to the Bunny Ranch being funded via the stimulus bill...then it was death panels, now it's "czars." (and in between those I listed...dozens of mini shit storms)

The problem with regressives is their selective amnesia...and/or thinking the general public is as stranded in deep space ignorance as they are. The rank and file American ALREADY KNOWS regressives lie or misrepresent with impunity. Who are they trying to fool?

Where were these idiot sticks for the last 40 years? Ever remember hearing a regressive complain about a "czar" before Obama showed up? Ever?
Show me where Obama ever complained loudly about Mr Danger's czars and/or promised he wouldn't hire a team of advisers to help coordinate policy in the White House. Since when does every adviser to the president need to be vetted by the Senate?

Hey...dipshit regressives...rather than bitch the day away...why not step up with a real solution to a real problem?




Slicing and dicing the regressive lunacy........

Obama did appoint Cantor’s other “czars.” But as even Fox News has admitted, the practice of presidents naming high-ranking advisers goes “back as far as FDR, and maybe further.” In fact, the debate over the role of unconfirmed Presidential advisers reaches back to 1832, with critics accusing President Andrew Jackson of running a “Kitchen Cabinet” in place of the official one.

President Bush was also a fan of czars, although Cantor wasn’t complaining about them at the time. In fact, the “Sudan czar” is actually the U.S. Special Envoy to Sudan, and during his tenure, Bush appointed several people to hold that position. Bush had so many czars that in 2007, satirist Andy Borowitz suggested the White House needed a “lying czar” to “oversee all distortions and misrepresentations.”

Bookmark and Share

  © Blogger template 'Minimalist H' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP